July 2016 Archives | Bergen County, New Jersey, Law Blog
Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf LLP
Call Today:

July 2016 Archives

Supreme Court Rejects Limitation on Employee's Right to Sue

fotolia_77439060.jpgIn Rodriguez v. Raymours Furniture, the plaintiff was hired by the defendant and, in his employment application, there was a provision requiring the applicant to bring any employment-related actions within six months of the adverse employment action, and waiving all contrary statutes of limitations. However, a later application did not contain the same contested provisions. In 2010, the plaintiff was injured on the job and, after returning to work, his employment was terminated. Seven months after his termination, he filed a complaint, alleging discrimination under the Law Against Discrimination ("LAD"). Rejecting the plaintiff's arguments of unconscionability, unenforceability and novation, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant, and the Appellate Division affirmed.

Supreme Court Rules on Protection of Divorcees

Copy-of-Fotolia_80752093_L-768x512.jpgOn June 21, 2016, the issue of whether the Law Against Discrimination ("LAD"), N.J.S.A. 10:5-1, protects individuals who are separated from their spouses or are in the process of divorce was decided by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. In Smith v. Millville Rescue Squad, Robert Smith was fired from his job at the Millville Rescue Squad, where he had worked for 17 years. Smith maintained that he was fired shortly after informing his supervisor of his affair with a co-worker and separation from his wife. During that time, Smith testified that his supervisor made several unsavory remarks expressing his belief that Smith would have an "ugly divorce" and went to the board of directors to address the situation. Smith explained that he had divorced his wife amicably, had never been subject to formal discipline and had been promoted twice. Consequently, Smith brought suit against the Millville Rescue Squad, asserting claims under the LAD and state Constitution for wrongful discrimination on the basis of sex and marital status. The Supreme Court noted that the term "marital status" was not defined in the LAD and, therefore, looked to the LAD's legislative intent. It ruled that discrimination based on marital status was not limited to the state of being single or married-the LAD also prohibits discrimination based on a prospective or current employees' status as single, married, separated, in the process of divorce or divorced. The Court thus ruled for Smith, reasoning that the supervisor's animus toward divorcing persons affected the company's overall decision to fire Smith. 

No Firm In Northern New Jersey Has More Experience Than We Do. Call 201-845-9600 Today To Put Our Knowledge On Your Side.

Email Us For a Response

Contact Northern New Jersey's Premiere Law Firm

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf LLP
Park 80 West-Plaza One
250 Pehle Avenue
Suite 401
Saddle Brook, NJ 07663

Phone: 201-684-9695
Phone: 201-845-9600
Fax: 201-845-9423
Saddle Brook Law Office Map

Review Us