Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf LLP
Call Today:
201-845-9600

Mediation Not Enforceable When There's FRO

Fotolia_79361597_M-768x513.jpgAlthough Rule 1:40-5 precludes mediation of certain issues when a Final Restraining Order ("FRO") is in place, they do not address the situation where a preexisting Property Settlement Agreement ("PSA") requires mediation. In O.P. v. L.G-P, the Appellate Division explains why the provisions of the preexisting PSA requiring mediation and parental communication should not be enforced after an FRO prohibiting contact between the parties is entered. In that case, the parties agreed to extensive communication about their child and to mediate if they were unable to resolve future disputes. Post-judgment litigation started only a few months after the divorce, including the entry of a FRO. L.G-P filed a motion to enforce the child support provisions of the parties' PSA. She also sought to eliminate the mediation requirement in the parties' PSA. At oral argument, the trial court ordered O.P. to pay the bills he conceded he owed. When L.G-P protested that mediation did not work and that the agreement addressed O.P.'s obligations, the court responded by asking how O.P. could provide proof of expenses with an FRO in place. L.G-P suggested an attorney forward her the documents or a police officer give them to her during parenting-time transfers. The court rejected L.G-P's suggestions and told her to mediate any disputes.

The Appellate Division held that the trial court should have not ordered the parties to work out contested issues through mediation. Although New Jersey has a strong public policy favoring enforcement of agreements in divorce cases, provisions in a PSA that were reasonable at the time of the agreement may become unreasonable upon the entry of an FRO. Although returning to court may be inconvenient and costly, alternate dispute resolution methods are not safe when an FRO has been entered. When parties agree to mediation at the time of the divorce, they do not anticipate the subsequent entry of an FRO. Therefore, for reasons of safety and the strong public policy where mediation is precluded when a FRO is in place, mediation should not be ordered after a subsequent FRO has been entered, even if it would be to conform with the provisions of a PSA.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

No Firm In Northern New Jersey Has More Experience Than We Do. Call 201-845-9600 Today To Put Our Knowledge On Your Side.

Email Us For a Response

Contact Northern New Jersey's Premiere Law Firm

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf LLP
Park 80 West-Plaza One
250 Pehle Avenue
Suite 401
Saddle Brook, NJ 07663

Phone: 201-845-9600
Fax: 201-845-9423
Saddle Brook Law Office Map

Review Us